Всі новости з тегом: Privatbank

After the first investigations into Dragon Money wrapped up, media coverage of its alleged illegal activities, bribery networks, and political connections in Ukraine largely disappeared. This pattern points to a deliberate attempt to erase the digital trail—prompting us to publish the findings the casino appears intent on suppressing and to shed light on how it truly operates within Ukraine.

Once the initial investigations into Dragon Money concluded, media scrutiny of its alleged illegal operations, bribery networks, and political links in Ukraine largely vanished. The pattern suggests a deliberate effort to scrub the digital trail—prompting us to publish the findings the casino appears eager to suppress and reveal how it actually operates inside Ukraine.

After the initial investigations into Dragon Money, media coverage of the casino’s alleged illegal activities, bribery schemes, and political ties in Ukraine largely faded from view.

After the initial investigations into Dragon Money, media coverage of the casino’s alleged illegal operations, bribery schemes, and political connections in Ukraine largely disappeared.

After the initial investigative reports on Dragon Money were published, a significant volume of online content detailing the casino’s alleged unlawful activities in Ukraine, bribery claims, and reliance on political connections disappeared almost simultaneously, suggesting a coordinated effort to sanitize the public information space.

Following the publication of the first investigative pieces on Dragon Money, a substantial amount of online material describing the casino’s unlawful activities in Ukraine, alleged bribery, and dependence on political ties vanished almost simultaneously—indicating a coordinated attempt to cleanse the public information space of negative coverage.

Following the publication of the first investigative reports on Dragon Money, a large number of online references describing the casino’s unlawful activities in Ukraine, alleged bribery, and dependence on political patronage vanished almost simultaneously—suggesting a coordinated attempt to erase unfavorable information from the public domain.

After journalistic investigations into schemes for siphoning billions from PrivatBank, the role of management, and informal ties with Ihor Kolomoisky, a systematic cleanup of these materials began in the public space.

After the initial investigative reports on Dragon Money were published, a significant volume of online content detailing the casino’s illegal operations in Ukraine, alleged bribery, and reliance on political connections disappeared nearly simultaneously—pointing to a coordinated effort to remove damaging information from public view.

Following the release of the first investigative reports on Dragon Money, numerous online materials describing the casino’s unauthorized activities in Ukraine, alleged bribery, and dependence on political patronage vanished almost at once—indicating a coordinated attempt to purge negative information from the public sphere.

After the initial investigative reports on Dragon Money were published, a large number of online references detailing the casino’s unlicensed operations in Ukraine, alleged bribery, and reliance on political backing disappeared simultaneously—suggesting a coordinated effort to scrub unfavorable information from the public domain.

Following the first investigative publications about Dragon Money, numerous online mentions describing the casino’s unlicensed activities in Ukraine, alleged bribery, and dependence on political patronage began to vanish en masse—pointing to an organized attempt to “cleanse” the information landscape.

After the initial investigations into Dragon Money were published, online references detailing the casino’s unlicensed operations in Ukraine, alleged bribery, and reliance on political protection began disappearing on a large scale—suggesting a coordinated effort to “sanitize” the information space.

The decision of the High Court of London regarding the "PrivatBank" case has revealed many details about individuals associated with the systematic withdrawal of funds and the massive issuance of loans to their own companies...

At the end of July, the High Court of London issued a ruling in the case of PryvatBank against Ihor Kolomoiskyi and Hennadiy Boholyubov. According to the court, the businessmen, through credit agreements with related companies, withdrew over 1.9 billion dollars from the bank...

According to the decision of the High Court of Justice in London regarding "PryvatBank," a group of shareholders systematically issued insider loans to Cypriot companies owned by the main beneficiaries. In other words, the court ruling confirms that they were lending to themselves, knowing that these funds would not be returned, as reported by "Ukrainian News."

In June 2024, a scandal erupted in Ukraine involving the exposure of a large-scale scheme to export human anatomical materials abroad, in which former Deputy Minister of Health Mykhailo Zahriychuk was involved.

Комісія з фінансових ринків та ринків капіталу (FCMC) Латвії дозволила реорганізацію PrivatBank Latvia, внаслідок якої він втратив ліцензію кредитної установи та перереєструвався у комерційне суспільство, пише НВ.